How do you judge the value of expertise on the Web? Does it differ from your notion of expertise in face-to-face settings? Why or why not?
I’d like to begin this blog with a quote by Tuffor (2005):
“Once we free ourselves from the mental limits of viewing this technology as a weak sister to face-to- face synchronous education, the potentials to revolutionize education and learning become readily apparent”
Please feel free to share your comments regarding this quote. I think it is a really powerful statement.
This question can be answered in many different ways, but I don’t think one particular answer is correct. An expertise is an expert in a skill or knowledge in a particular field (Dictionary). This vague definition still does nothing for me as far as explaining what an expert is. Does it vary on the eye of the beholder or must an individual be granted an “expert” certificate, or is it depending upon how much you are able to efficiently and accurately perform on the web while incorporating web 2.0 tools? An expert cannot have a single definition, a MD may be an expert in medicine, but not necessarily an expert in ID, so does this make him a complete expert or just a medical expert and visa verse?
Focusing on a web expert I think their are certain attributes that contribute to an individuals expertise. And as time continues I think acquiring and perfecting skills such as web design, social media, blogs and communication could help you become an expert. Also keep in mind that you do not have to always be an expert in every single area. Reiser (2012), suggested that while you are a student you should develop your own area of expertise, this will allow you to stand out among the others. However, regarding web expertise an individual should be very well versed in web 2.0 tools (livemocha, Blogger, Wiki, faceboook, twitter etc.). Keeping up with Web trends and technology is vital to become an expert on the web.
A face to face setting does differ, but I think within the next few years the web and F2F learning will merge into one, Beth Mole (2012) said, “Technology will create more opportunities for students to connect to others—mentors, peers, sources—for enhanced learning experience.” This communication will bridge the gap in F2F learning. I think with F2F learning and eLearning there is not too much of a difference. F2F as well as eLearning both incorporate technology and both utilize, “presentation of ideas by the students, group discussions, arguments and many other forms of conveying information and accumulating knowledge” (Rashy, 2005).
I thought this table may help compare:
I think the quote is very appropriate. I have talked to many people in the past about the differences and it usually seems that those who have little, if any, experience in online education, have certain mental perceptions that block them against it.
ReplyDeleteResearch that I have read recently suggest that there is no real significant difference in one being better than the other in terms of learning. At this point, it's a matter of preference. However, I think education will continue to change and those who are not on board will find themselves faced with some difficult choices if they don't adapt. Thanks for your thoughts. :)